“Jawan Fees Unveiled: Deepika Padukone’s Unique Fees amount for a Cameo, Reveals her Special Bond with Shah Rukh Khan”
Shah Rukh Khan’s Jawan is one of the most anticipated Bollywood films of the year. Directed by Atlee, the film also stars Nayanthara and Vijay Sethupathi in pivotal roles, with Deepika Padukone making a cameo appearance. Recently, in an interview, Deepika revealed that she didn’t charge a penny for her role in Jawan. She gave a heartwarming response to the question, saying, “I didn’t charge a penny for Jawan because it’s a Shah Rukh Khan film. And I’m sure you know how much I admire him and respect him.”
Deepika’s gesture has won the hearts of fans and critics alike. It is a testament to her close friendship with Shah Rukh Khan and her dedication to her craft. Deepika Padukone and Shah Rukh Khan have worked together on several successful films in the past, including Om Shanti Om, Chennai Express, and Happy New Year. They share a close bond both on and off screen. Deepika’s decision to not charge any fee for Jawan is a reflection of her generosity and her commitment to the film. It is a gesture that is sure to inspire other actors and actresses in the industry.
Jawan has had a phenomenal start at the box office, breaking records and surpassing many biggies in its first week of release. The film has crossed over 600 crores worldwide, and is still going strong. It seems like the Shah Rukh Khan fever is not going to die down anytime soon. In an interview with The Week, Deepika Padukone was asked if she charges money for special appearances in her films. She replied, “No, I don’t.”
She went on to say that she wanted to be a part of the film 83 because she wanted it to be an ode to women who stand behind their husbands’ success. She explained that she had watched her mother do it, and this was her homage to wives who make sacrifices to support their husbands’ careers. Padukone also said that she would do any special appearance for Shah Rukh Khan or Rohit Shetty, two directors she has worked with extensively in the past.
